Why "it was only $50" still matters — and why a theft conviction follows you forever.
Theft is one of the most common arrest categories in Texas — from a college student caught at Target, to a contractor accused of taking deposits without finishing the job, to an employee facing embezzlement allegations after 15 years on the job.
What makes theft cases different from most other criminal charges is the long shadow they cast. Texas courts and employers treat theft as a crime of moral turpitude. A theft conviction — even a small one — can disqualify you from professional licenses, government jobs, security clearances, and many private-sector roles for the rest of your life.
Here is how Texas theft law works, where the defense angles live, and what record options exist.
Under Penal Code § 31.03, a person commits theft if they unlawfully appropriate property with intent to deprive the owner of the property. "Appropriate" means to acquire or otherwise exercise control over. "Unlawfully" means without the owner's effective consent or knowing the property was stolen.
Theft consolidates a number of older offenses into one statute — what used to be larceny, embezzlement, conversion, false pretenses, and receiving stolen property are now all "theft" under Texas law.
The grade of the offense is driven almost entirely by the value of the property taken. As of 2026, the thresholds are:
Several factors push the charge to the next level regardless of value:
Value is fair-market value at the time and place of the offense. For retail goods, the state typically uses the price tag — but the law actually requires fair market value, not the sticker. Marked-up retail price is often litigated, especially near threshold cutoffs ($740 vs. $760 is the difference between Class B and Class A).
For stolen services (Theft of Service under § 31.04), value is the contract price or the published rate.
Most retail theft cases follow the same pattern: loss-prevention officer sees the conduct on camera, stops the suspect outside the last point of sale, recovers the merchandise, calls police, and either gets a citation or an arrest. Common defense issues include:
Section 31.04 covers cases like dine-and-dash, refusing to return rental property, and contractor disputes where deposits were taken but work was not done. Contractor cases can be especially tricky because the line between civil breach of contract and criminal theft turns on intent at the time the money was taken. Many of these cases are over-charged and resolve well with proper documentation of work performed, materials purchased, and good-faith effort.
Texas does not have a separate embezzlement statute — these cases are charged as theft, often with state jail or higher exposure because of aggregation and the fiduciary-relationship enhancement under § 31.03(f)(2). Defense angles include:
Theft is a "crime of moral turpitude" in Texas. Practical consequences include:
Every theft offense requires intent to deprive. Forgetfulness, distraction, mistaken belief of ownership, and disputed authorization are all defenses to intent.
Pushing value below the next threshold can change the entire case — from felony to misdemeanor, or misdemeanor to fine-only Class C.
Surveillance video, eyewitness identification, and loss-prevention reports are often weaker than they look. Cross-examination on lighting, angle, time-stamps, and chain of custody can be decisive.
Searches of bags, vehicles, lockers, and homes raise Fourth Amendment questions. Statements made to loss prevention while detained, or to officers without Miranda, raise Fifth Amendment questions.
Many North Texas counties offer diversion programs for first-offense theft cases:
Texas record-clearance options for theft cases:
Wyde & Associates handles both the underlying defense and the record-clearance work — see our criminal record clearing practice for what becomes possible once the case is resolved.
Tell us briefly what is going on. An attorney will respond.
Counsel available 24/7 · Confidential · No obligation