Rear-Ended in Texas? Here’s How Courts Decide Who Is Truly at Fault

Rear-end collisions are among the most frequently litigated auto accident cases in Texas. Although many people assume that the rear driver is always at fault, Texas law does not establish negligence as a matter of law based solely on the occurrence of a rear-end impact. Instead, courts carefully examine the specific facts and circumstances, including the driving behavior of both the front and rear drivers, to determine who breached the duty of ordinary care.

Texas case law demonstrates that liability in rear-end collisions is highly fact-dependent. Courts have found front drivers contributorily negligent in certain circumstances, while in others they have held rear drivers clearly liable as a matter of law. Below is a detailed examination of these rulings.

⸻

I. When Texas Courts Find the Front Driver Contributorily Negligent

Although less common, Texas courts do find front drivers liable or partially liable when their conduct creates an unreasonable or unexpected hazard.

1. Abrupt Stops Without Justification

In Rash v. Whisennand, 453 S.W.2d 353, the court held the front driver contributorily negligent for stopping “more abruptly than a person of ordinary prudence” would have done. The sudden stop was a proximate cause of the collision, and the appellate court reversed the judgment in favor of the front driver.

2. Slowing or Stopping at a Location Where a Reasonable Driver Would Not

In Burnett v. Howard, 466 S.W.2d 16, the front driver slowed abruptly in an unexpected location. The jury found, and the appellate court affirmed, that this conduct constituted contributory negligence.

3. Unsafe or Sudden Stopping on Public Highways

In McNutt v. Qualls, 433 S.W.2d 521, a front driver suddenly stopped on a highway when it could not be done safely. The court upheld a finding of contributory negligence, reinforcing the principle that all drivers must make stops only when safe and reasonable.

Key Principle:

A front driver can be held at fault if they create a sudden hazard that an ordinarily prudent rear driver could not reasonably anticipate.
MAXIMIZE YOUR CLAIM

II. When Texas Courts Hold the Rear Driver Fully Liable


More commonly, courts assign liability to the rear driver, especially when the evidence shows a failure to maintain a proper lookout, failure to control speed, or following too closely.


1. Following Too Closely or Failing to Stop


In Cummings v. Van Valin, 363 S.W.2d 385, the rear driver was found negligent for tailgating, failing to stop at a light, and failing to maintain a proper lookout. All were proximate causes of the collision.


2. Failing to Maintain a Proper Lookout Even in Adverse Conditions


In Meinen v. Mercer, 390 S.W.2d 36, the rear driver argued that a slippery road contributed to the collision. The court rejected this defense and held him negligent as a matter of law, emphasizing the duty to maintain control regardless of weather conditions.


3. Colliding with a Properly Stopped Vehicle


In Sumners Road Boring, Inc. v. Thompson, 393 S.W.2d 690, the rear driver struck a vehicle stopped at a traffic signal. The court found negligence because the front vehicle was lawfully stopped and visible.


Key Principle:


Rear drivers must maintain a safe distance and keep a proper lookout. Failure to do so is frequently treated as clear negligence.

MAXIMIZE YOUR CLAIM

III. A Rear-End Collision Alone Does Not Establish Negligence


Multiple courts have held that the mere fact of a rear-end impact is insufficient to create negligence as a matter of law.


1. Specific Acts of Negligence Must Be Proven


In Jordan v. Sava, Inc., 222 S.W.3d 840, the court reiterated that negligence cannot be presumed solely from the fact of a rear-end collision.


2. Evidence Must Show Breach of a Duty


In Stone v. Sulak, 994 S.W.2d 348, the court rejected the argument that rear-end collisions automatically establish negligence. Instead, there must be evidence of specific negligent conduct—such as failure to maintain speed, distance, or lookout.


Key Principle:


Texas law requires proof of specific negligent acts. Rear-end impacts are not per se negligence cases.

MAXIMIZE YOUR CLAIM

IV. Conclusion


Liability in Texas rear-end collisions depends on the conduct of both drivers under the circumstances.

 • Front drivers may be contributorily negligent for sudden or unsafe stops.

 • Rear drivers are often held liable for failing to maintain a proper lookout, following too closely, or failing to stop safely.

 • Courts rely on the overarching standard of ordinary care and evaluate proximate cause based on detailed factual analysis.


Understanding how courts analyze these cases helps injury victims assess their legal options and strengthens the foundation for pursuing compensation.


If you were rear-ended in Texas—or accused of causing a rear-end collision—our firm can evaluate your case, explain your rights, and help you maximize your settlement. Rear-end liability is complex, and insurance companies routinely try to shift blame.


Contact Wyde & Associates today to protect your claim.

MAXIMIZE YOUR CLAIM