Understanding the Consequences of a Theft Conviction in Texas

A theft accusation in Texas can carry long-lasting consequences—far beyond a simple criminal record. Whether you are a lawyer advising a client or someone personally facing theft charges, it is essential to understand how Texas law treats theft offenses, how the law has evolved, and what impact such a conviction can have on immigration status and future opportunities. This article provides a comprehensive overview of the legal implications of theft in Texas, including its classification as a crime of moral turpitude and the limited circumstances under which it can be sealed or expunged.

The Evolution of Theft Law in Texas

Historically, Texas law distinguished between numerous fraud-related offenses such as theft by false pretext, embezzlement, and swindling. However, the modern Texas Penal Code consolidates these formerly separate crimes into a single offense of theft. Under Tex. Penal Code § 31.02, theft is defined as a unified offense encompassing all conduct that involves unlawfully appropriating property with the intent to deprive the owner.

This statutory consolidation reflects the Legislature’s recognition that fraudulent conduct often shares similar elements and should be treated uniformly. As a result, conduct that once fell into multiple categories is now prosecuted simply as “theft.”

Theft as a Crime of Moral Turpitude

Texas courts consistently classify theft as a crime of moral turpitude—a legal designation that carries serious collateral consequences. Crimes of moral turpitude are offenses that gravely violate community standards of honesty and morality. Because theft inherently involves dishonesty, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals and appellate courts have repeatedly affirmed that theft qualifies.

Cases such as Ludwig v. State, Hardeman v. State, and Arnold v. State reaffirm that a theft conviction can be used to impeach a witness’s credibility, affect eligibility for certain professional licenses, and even impact family law matters such as custody disputes. Once labeled a crime of moral turpitude, the stigma of a theft conviction can follow an individual for decades.
Learn If You Qualify


Immigration Consequences of a Theft Conviction


For non-citizens, the consequences can be far more severe. Theft is considered a crime involving moral turpitude (CIMT) under federal immigration law. Depending on the circumstances, a theft conviction may lead to:


Deportability under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(ii) if the individual has multiple CIMT convictions.

Inadmissibility, meaning the person may be barred from re-entering the United States or adjusting immigration status.

Aggravated felony consequences under 8 U.S.C. § 1101(a)(43)(G) if the theft offense carries a sentence of at least one year—even if actual jail time is not served.


Texas cases such as Ex parte Torres, Ex parte De Los Reyes, and Ex parte Luna highlight how even deferred adjudication or community supervision can still trigger serious immigration consequences. A single moment of poor judgment can therefore jeopardize a person’s ability to work, study, or remain lawfully in the United States.



Can a Theft Conviction Be Expunged or Sealed in Texas?


The ability to clear a theft record depends heavily on how the case was resolved:



Expunction


Expunction is the most powerful form of relief, but it is generally available only when the case did not result in a conviction. Eligible situations may include:


Dismissed charges

Acquittals

Deferred adjudication for certain Class C misdemeanors

Certain pretrial diversion outcomes


If a case resulted in a conviction—even a minor one—expunction is usually not an option.



Orders of Nondisclosure (Record Sealing)


In limited circumstances, an individual may seal a theft case through an Order of Nondisclosure. This typically requires:


Successful completion of deferred adjudication, and

Meeting the waiting periods and eligibility requirements under the Government Code


However, nondisclosure cannot be used to seal straight convictions. And even sealed records remain available to law enforcement and certain government agencies.

Learn If You Qualify


Limitations


Because theft is a crime of moral turpitude, Texas law restricts the availability of record-clearing remedies for theft convictions. Individuals with straight convictions face significant hurdles, making it critical to seek knowledgeable counsel before entering any plea.



Conclusion


A theft conviction in Texas carries consequences that reach far beyond the courtroom. From its classification as a crime of moral turpitude to its potential impact on immigration status, professional opportunities, and long-term reputation, the effects can be substantial and lasting. Understanding the legal landscape—including the historical evolution of theft law and the limited availability of expunction or nondisclosure—is essential for anyone facing theft charges.


Legal guidance can make a profound difference in navigating these issues. Whether exploring defense strategies, negotiating outcomes that preserve future opportunities, or pursuing post-conviction relief, informed counsel is crucial to mitigating the long-term consequences of a theft case.

Learn If You Qualify